Have you ever laughed at women saying 'Game' doesn't work? And then you posted a picture of you with hot women, and these same women started taking an interest in you? Or your wife starts to desire you more after the waitress or a female coworker was a bit too friendly to her taste? Or the moment you start not caring what her opinion of you is, and she begins seeking your approval?

Yes, most women will staunchly tell you that it does not work, but your experience will tell you otherwise, and you won't listen to what women say.

It is the same with women who listen to guys saying they prefer natural beauty over manufactured beauty; they know they are transparent without make-up or other enhancements, but when they start putting it on, they get way more attention, approaches, and offers.

If you have female friends who have gone through a glow-up phase using all the products guys say they hate women putting on, they will tell you that not only did they start getting more attention from guys, but also the quality (i.e., SMV) of the guys also improved dramatically.

Whether it is women or men, neither likes to be lied to. Women would not want to know the men they are with have learned Game; or that they had to develop charisma, because most men are not born with it. The moment a woman realises a man had to attend some training in the field, it would be off-putting to them, as they believed it would take away the genuine character of who the men are ("I associated myself with a loser who manufactured himself"). This is why when you break Frame, it is hardly recoverable. It is that belief of being perfect, but guys know they have to build themselves from the ground up. Women don't care because it's not a female experience.

Conversely, men don't like to wake up to a Master Splinter, who has artificially increased her SMV (which is primarily related to beauty and age-related factors), when the night before, they thought they dealt with a Baddie. They would like to believe that the girl they are with is naturally beautiful without the need for all these extras. The reality is that most men have no clue about the level of manufacturing, even those that appear to be natural-looking. Like men without experience and improved character, women are not as great without makeup and whatnot after a certain age. When they are in their late teens or early 20s, it's not that hard to look pretty if they are not overweight. But past a certain point, they would become transparent without any enhancements. That is why, as they age, their beauty budget becomes increasingly relevant and substantial, helping them fool the guys into believing they are young and fertile.

Not appreciating that manufactured beauty works for men is the equivalent of women saying Game does not work on them.

A lie we tell ourselves because we believe that we are omniscient, beyond what we are, thinking our consciousness outshines our reptilian brains. Both a work of ego and delusion. Which, in today's world, is quite prevalent, as social media creates ego and echo chambers that validate our beliefs and feelings.

But men are no better than women here, and it also shows they are as manipulable as women, if not more, because denying the reality is buying into the lie we tell ourselves that soothes our feelings of unfairness that women have it easier. It is fine to think that we know better than the market, except that the market is never wrong on a long enough timeline.

Let's use the example of women's football (or soccer, as it is commonly called in the US). Nobody gives two fucks about women's football, let's be real. Who is the most followed woman on IG? A blonde chick who underwent a complete makeover to resemble the stereotypical blonde baddie, from being some podgy-looking mid (17 million followers Alisha Lehmann). What did she win? FUCK ALL. And she is miles ahead of the second-most-followed female soccer player, who is also a more naturally attractive, with lighter makeup, and is a two-time World Cup winner (Alex Morgan, with 10 million followers). What about Megan Rapinoe, who has been the most mediatised, she only has two million, as she is the typical Butch looking woman.

The reality is that whether it is guys or women who believe they know more than the market, they are the most easily targetable bunch, like the people who think advertisers can't fool them. They are the easiest, as their ego is so large that you have to tell them the lies they want to believe. The people who feel they know it all are the most ripe to listen to what you have to say, as long as you go their way, because they are desperate to have a resonance box as a way to validate their superiority.

The most egotistical bitches are the easiest to fool because you can see their agenda from a mile away, and their hubris is as perceivable as their propensity to become manipulated. That is why guys with big egos are the easiest to manipulate from a woman's perspective. Especially the guys who have not earned theirs, as they only show their beginner's card in the mating dance.

Women just adapted in making guys believe what they want to see to appear natural whilst using makeup, when guys focus on what the most ridiculous Ms Potatoe Heads look like with airbags for asses, and melons for boobs to disprove the fact that enhancement works despite them not liking it. And even then these guys don't wank on flat and natural pancakes when they go on Pornhub.

Another trend I have noticed is that guys make the women who like them the type of girls they think are the best. Another example of their ego protection and validation-seeking through the female lens. Typical projection on the broader market that disproves their individualistic lens. What does it look like?

I recall a few instances at university when I would talk with guys rating girls in the class and ask them what they thought of a particular girl. Bang average would be the most common answer. Then one of these average girls started taking a liking to them, and these guys would catch wind of it. I would ask again, and they would start telling me, 'No, she is cute, she has a charm.' Yes the one which is called liking your ass lol.

Another example is when I used to ask the guys to go to some clubs or lounges to chat up these manufactured broads. They would saying stuff like "no I am not interested as they are fake and ugly", and when I brought one to them they started melting like a smitten junior high chick when the popular jock would give them the attention they have always craved from him. Only telegraphing, they either had a bad experience or were intimidated and did not feel entitled to speak to them.

To understand men, you have to understand their ego and the story they have to tell themselves to cope. Or in other words, ego protection.

The same way they will relate a story, and then you hear the woman's version of it, to make your assessment, knowing both individuals, and determine which version is likelier.

The level of cognitive dissonance is so profound that eventually you realise people are desperate to be lied to, which is precisely what marketers understand. Try to make an authentic, non-cringe ad, thinking it will sell, but it won't. Create some overt get-rich-quick schemes with a leased Lambo as part of the advert and see you make seven figures on your B2C offering. People will tell you they wouldn't fall for such a ridiculous marketing stunt, but even I, despite my dislike, have to admit the 2nd-hand car salesman tactic works for a reason. I wish it weren't the case, but denying reality won't make me better than others who appreciate it and use it to their benefit. People are not as smart as they think they are.

The same way I dislike threads on X. I find that it is, for the most part, rewarding individuals with low attention spans, dopamine-fueled, quick-hit junkies who will build your followers count through engagement.

To continue with the level of cognitive dissonance men suffer, they will complain that they had more success when they pretended to be someone they are not with women, when they lied to them, than when they were being honest. To sell, you must cater to the buyer's agenda, not the seller's. So they catered to the idea women had of themselves, only to be disappointed when women saw the real person. The reality is that the real him would never have gotten the girl because she would not have been attracted to him. That is why Genuine Frame will provide you with quality, not quantity, but most don't benefit from quantity when it comes to segmenting for quality. The same way Natural with enhancement looks or full-manufactured looks will get you more offers, just not necessarily the ones you want. Still, you can't get to these opportunities without partaking in them to an extent, as the competition makes sure of that.

This is why girls do the same, they will cake themselves up to get past the first stage of the filtering mechanism, because it is all fine and dandy to hear guys say they won't take these girls seriously if they make themselves look like prostitutes but guess what, these women are the ones who catch their attention. Guys fall in love with whores, otherwise we would not say don't try to turn a hoe into a housewife. These women have learned the game and, beyond their looks and sex skills, know how to steal a man's soul. Guys who say it doesn't work on them just haven't met one, either because they haven't had the opportunity or because they make their weakness a virtue.

These women understood that to get what they wanted, they needed to go beyond what resonated with them, but what resonated with men, despite what the low-cognition men would say, was what would resonate with them. The same way men are being told not to listen to women when it comes to dating advice (and they would not be wrong). The reality is that, for the most part, both genders are not as self-aware as they would like to believe. As most people’s decisions are defined by their subconscious reactiveness. You can only see that if you have tested and seen for yourself what is being said and what is being rewarded. Women get rewarded with fake looks, men get rewarded with fake personas, because both cater to what works, not what people want to work because it sounds good. There is a clear difference.

Not appreciating that reality is not appreciating the power of influence. Influence is subtle and extends beyond what the conscious mind allows, for the same reason you follow people on here: they have managed to speak to your psyche in ways others have not. It goes beyond dating and relationships; it's about how we feel close to someone through their ideas, our association with their brand, and the looks they have that we want to be associated with.

A common misconception among the simple-minded is that their judgment makes them feel superior to a particular situation, when in reality, it makes them vulnerable to someone using it to their benefit against them. It is the illusion of knowledge, benefiting the ego at the expense of the outcome.

One way guys get bamboozled is when they get love-bombed by a girl, as many of them are starved of attention or affection. The woman then creates a validation loop, where she becomes the judge of his self-esteem (ironic, isn't it). All of that stemmed from an ego that was so desperate for appreciation. That same ego which holds men back from looking at the lie she was selling him. The hotter she is, the less the need for love-bombing because any crumbs of validation will feel like the world to the guy. Thus, women's focus on looks enhancement. Men feel it is unfair because they did not have to work for it. It is fair game for the girls because it works; however, men don't like it and will say it doesn't work, where men's feelings deny a reality they don't want to appreciate. Yup. Sounds like a bitch behaviour.

Women are more ruthless because they have less time on their end and are the weaker sex; that is why they are not as idealistic or wishful thinking as guys who want to feel they are being appreciated for who they are and not what they provide. The longer someone works under that ideal, the tougher the lessons will be.

Even the idea of Genuine Desire is a lie we tell ourselves, and that the woman, if she has any Game, has to create as a reality to get what she wants from the guy by selling that idea to him. Desire is fleeting; therefore, it has no grounding. Yes, it will develop good dispositions for the future, but appreciating it as something that is a constant and not a circumstantial event is asking to be fooled when the routine of a relationship takes place. Yet so many guys will look at it as the be-all and end-all. Not denying that it is a good litmus test to start with, but the ego validation that can come from it, should it not be appreciated for what it is, aka an indicator of goodwill towards you, will lead many to a path of misplaced, conditional and unearned confidence. Hubris is what they call it. And they will crash out, when it is taken away from them, when the girl had all the power and they were the bitch to her validation.

Appreciating that you are different from others does not make you that much different. Everyone thinks they are special when they are not; that is why making someone feel as such is the lie everybody needs to manufacture to gain someone's good graces. The higher the person's worth, the more valuable the gesture. Many people complain about the commodification of people within society, not realising the role they play in shaping it with their day-to-day interactions and choices.

This goes to show the general lack of self-awareness, and the prevalent idea that in a feminine sponsored society, we are full of spiritual bitches who prefer saying what feels good rather than appreciating what works, forgetting to take themselves and their barely sentient character outside of the equation to understand their gender experience goes beyond what they think it is and have to put themselves in the other sex's shoes to appreciate what the reality actually is.

The perception we consider reality is often the lie we tell ourselves, based on the signals others display to help us reach what we and they want you to believe is the truth. Believing in a lie does not make it accurate, no matter how much you want to think it is true. For the same reason, the person you lied to about who you are ended up validating your lie through the actions you welcomed from them, appreciating that what you feel resonates with you is just a perception that you wanted to be sold on. Sell or Be Sold. Thinking that it is nothing else but that only shows you want to be lied to, confirming the truth you have been fighting against:

The fact that you don't know what you don't know.

This is why just being yourself did not work, because you did not lie to the perception others wanted to have of you.

And if you want to be more socially successful and having the objective abundance with people, lying to them is what is going to enable you to get there, unless you are at the top of the hierarchy where lies are unnecessary, as people will lie to themselves about you based on the built-in perception they have of you.

The narrative we tell ourselves is just a lie we believe to be true that we want other people to validate. Not appreciating it is only making you the future Mark you feel you are not, but everyone else, other than you, who masters the Game knows you are. That you won't know until you realise the lies you have been telling yourself are what screwed you over, but that won't happen until you drop your ego and appreciate that being a solipstic bitch only guarantees you the adverse outcomes of one, except that you don't have a bailout called a pussy. Still, you bear the shame of being one by behaving as such.

‍